What happens when actions stop disappearing
Results from teams in our pilot programme. Names withheld at their request — numbers reported exactly as measured.
action completion rate
vs ~50% industry norm
average time to close an action
down from over a week
fewer repeat discussions
same topic, second meeting
saved per person, per week
no note-taking or chasing
Measured across Loopion pilot teams. Individual results vary with meeting cadence and team size.
The challenge
Weekly leadership meetings produced 15–20 commitments — and by the next meeting, nobody could say which ones were done. The team was re-litigating the same decisions every week, and the ops lead was spending Friday afternoons manually chasing people on Slack and email.
What they did
Loopion was added to the leadership meeting series and three department standups. It joined automatically, extracted every commitment with an owner and deadline, and posted the recap into each meeting's Teams chat when the next occurrence started. Anything unfinished was carried forward and re-surfaced there.
The results
- ✓Action completion climbed to 87% within the pilot period
- ✓Average time to close an action dropped to 2.1 days
- ✓Friday 'chasing time' effectively disappeared
“The carry-forward is the killer feature. Nothing gets to quietly die anymore — it shows up at the top of the next meeting until someone deals with it.”
The challenge
Sprint retros and incident reviews generated great intentions and zero follow-through. Post-incident action items — the ones that actually prevent repeat outages — were tracked in a wiki page nobody opened. The same classes of incident kept recurring.
What they did
Loopion captured actions from retros and incident reviews, assigned them to the engineers who volunteered in the meeting, and posted them where the team already worked — the Teams channel. Overdue items were flagged with their age, publicly and politely.
The results
- ✓Repeat discussions on the same issues dropped by roughly 30%
- ✓Post-incident actions stopped going stale in the wiki
- ✓Retro follow-through became visible to the whole team
“Public deadlines changed behaviour more than any process doc we ever wrote. When it's posted in the channel with your name on it, you do it.”
The challenge
Cross-functional planning meetings involved product, engineering, compliance, and design — and every team kept its own version of what was agreed. Decisions were remembered differently, and each meeting started with 15 minutes of 'wait, what did we say last time?'
What they did
Loopion became the single shared record. One recap per meeting, one list of actions with named owners, posted to the shared channel. Series memory carried context across the meeting sequence, so recurring meetings started from the actual state of play, not from memory.
The results
- ✓Meetings started from a shared, written state of play
- ✓Each person saved 4+ hours a week on notes and follow-up
- ✓Disputes about 'what we agreed' effectively ended
“It's the difference between four teams with four sets of notes and one source of truth that nobody has to maintain.”
Get results like these
Add Loopion to one recurring meeting. Watch what happens to completion in two weeks.
14-day money-back guarantee · Cancel anytime